The Kenyan Parliament has banned the wearing of Kaunda suits in the building. Speaker of Parliament Moses Wetangula said that the suits, as well as traditional African clothing, are not acceptable.
The Kaunda suit is a collarless, short-sleeved suit that is named after the late Zambian President Kenneth Kaunda. It is a popular choice for politicians and other public figures in Africa.
Wetangula said that the decision to ban the Kaunda suit was made because of the “emerging fashion trends” that are threatening the established parliamentary dress code. He said that a proper dress code for men includes a coat, a collar, a tie, a long-sleeved shirt, long trousers, socks, shoes, or a service uniform. For women, business, formal, or smart casual wear is appropriate.
The ban on the Kaunda suit has been met with mixed reactions. Some people are surprised that a “traditional African” garment has been banned by an African parliament. Others support the ban, saying that it is necessary to maintain a professional atmosphere in the legislature.
Opinion
We believe that the ban on the Kaunda suit is a missed opportunity to celebrate African culture. The Kaunda suit is a unique and stylish garment that is associated with a rich history of African leadership.
We understand that the Speaker of Parliament is concerned about maintaining a professional atmosphere in the legislature. However, We believe that there are ways to do this without banning a traditional African garment.
For example, the Speaker could have issued guidelines on how to wear the Kaunda suit in a professional manner. This could have included requirements for collared shirts and long sleeves.
Banning the Kaunda suit is a symbolic gesture that sends the message that traditional African culture is not welcome in the Kenyan Parliament. This is a shame, as it undermines the importance of African heritage.
